Up to bat at Team PA: our dear friend MRP, whom we have known for upwards of -- goodness! -- 16 years now, and who is by far the funniest and most talented Dewars-swilling, casino-haunting, avant-theatre-participating music enthusiast to ever come out of the Bucks County PA / West-Central NJ region. (Seriously, there was a time when I (HT) would see MRP only at weddings and casinos, which now leads me to ponder the viability of a Four Weddings|Oceans 11 cinematic mashup, which -- well, let's forget I said anything.) When I asked him how I should describe his day job, MRP suggested I put down: "A Not Traditionally Glamorous Position with a Relatively Glamorous Media Conglomerate," which I don't think can be beat for its simultaneity of clarity and obfuscation. MRP lives in NYC with a lass and their dog, and on an irregular basis will be reviewing music you'd probably like if you went to high school between 1986 and, say, 1996, aka An Irregularly Appearing Review of Pseudo-Indie but Probably More Semi-Mainstream Albums. Without further ado...
I was raised
largely on folk and jazz: those are both all about quotations; if you're
listening to bebop and you don't hear the quotations, you don't get the music,
you don't understand it…I don't necessarily want everyone to get all of the
references and exhaust the meaning of the song – that would be, that would be
horrible.
-Stephin Merritt of
The Magnetic Fields, interviewed as part of the NPR series "Creators at
Carnegie," November 2005.
As a fan of The
Magnetic Fields, I am constantly at war with myself. If you were to ask me what
I thought constituted "good" music, I would probably rattle off a
too-clever-by-half list of vagaries: raw vulnerability, innovative
instrumentation, and avant-garde originality. On their face, sure, these
things could surely constitute the criteria for "good" songwriting. (Yes, they
also come close to smacking of a certain type of "indie" elitism.) However, if
you were then to ask me what I liked about The Magnetic Fields, I'd look at you
sheepishly and then cop to loving his geeky wordplay, his dry delivery, his
sappiness in spite of his dryness, his gender-bending narrators, his almost
pathological focus on love, his backward-looking referentiality, his
inward-looking self-referentiality, and his humor (I would probably mumble when
mentioning this last one: laughter is far from cool).
In my original draft
of this review, the word count had reached 750 before I had even started
discussing Distortion. I was attempting to address Merritt's ceaseless
referencing, both to the history of popular music and, to an increasing extent,
his own work. I thought this sort of approach would befit the review's
appearance on PA. But then, well, I sort of wrote myself into a corner.
(Whether that approach basically starts out in the corner is another matter…)
So I got over myself and started over.
How, then, does
Distortion stack up? Merritt's wordplay is there in all its finest, as is his
taste for internal rhymes, impeccable arrangements, and memorable melodies. In
addition, the breadth of the music's references continues to impress: "Too
Drunk to Dream" sounds like an homage to a Buddy Holly-era break-up tune, no
matter how abject the lyrics turn; "California Girls" is a scathing, violent,
and hysterical inversion of the Beach Boys' original sentiment, and so on.
Another strategy
would have been to identify each song's antecedents on prior TMF albums; with
Distortion, I think Merritt has turned more inward than before. Underneath each
song, I heard shades and allusions and snippets of earlier TMF tunes. Was that
a bit of "Fear of Trains" in the piano run in the background of "Drive on,
Driver?" Was "Xavier Says" on Distant Plastic Trees? If not, was "Please Stop
Dancing" on Get Lost? Is "Mr. Mistletoe" an even-more-bitter cousin to Hyacinth
& Thistle's "I've Got New York?"
What to make of all
this footnoting? Does it, in the end, matter? At the end of the day, what if
"Old Fools" sounds sort of like something that I'm pretty sure was on Volume 3
of 69 Love Songs? No, it does not, because the doleful observer of "Old Fools"
almost makes me cry every time. And the same goes for "I'll Dream Alone," in
all its melodramatic beauty. That song makes me want to get a barstool and a
mic and start telling you about a girl I knew in college, which is why it's my
favorite on the album. And what about the goofy-at-first-glance "The Nun's
Litany?" Well, it's been a while since a song made me laugh and then want to
look back on life and wonder about what could have been. And "Courtesans" –
rarely has a song so successfully taken a gimlet-eyed look at an entire
vocation while pulling on your heartstrings so consistently.

Also, does it matter
that I've avoided the whole distortion thing on Distortion? Well, I'd argue
that the distortion is sort of beside the point; it is what it is. In its weird
way it's both entirely integral to the album, and yet, unnecessary, and this
may be where Merritt trips himself up: his clinicism. I remember Merritt once
discussing the equivalence of sounds generated by different sources; that is –
permit me to butcher his point here – an electrical guitar shouldn't, on some
level, be considered any differently than an acoustic guitar or a synth. All
three generate waves, after all. From this point of view, experimenting with
sounds becomes just that: an experiment. And so, the loud songs aren't really that
loud – they're "loud." It's to Merritt's credit that he taps such a deep well
of real feeling, in spite of each song being held at arm's length. Of course,
it's that the songs are at war with themselves that makes me love it in the
first place. It's why it's a Magnetic Fields record in the first place, and a great one at that.
Recent Comments